Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Logical Replication to Older Version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Logical Replication to Older Version
From: Miles Elam <miles.elam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 08:49:22 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAALojA_A+6CO375Fbh6+6oUuMJmY5aaYfMihBP4O9yfJrKsF6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAALojA_A+6CO375Fbh6+6oUuMJmY5aaYfMihBP4O9yfJrKsF6g@mail.gmail.com>

Follow up to this. Turns out we had a table without a primary key which halted the ongoing replication.

Reviewing this document in detail now.
https://pgdash.io/blog/postgres-replication-gotchas.html

- Miles Elam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Logical Replication to Older Version
  - From: Miles Elam

Prev by Date: Logical Replication to Older Version
Next by Date: How does postgres behave if several indexes have (nearly) identical conditions?
Previous by thread: Logical Replication to Older Version
Next by thread: How does postgres behave if several indexes have (nearly) identical conditions?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux