Re-reading my post, I see that even the élise is not sorted correctly on w10...
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 7:07 PM Marc Millas <marc.millas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,context:one postgres 12 on centos 7one postgres 12 on windows 10both on machines with french as defaultthe centos 7 lc_collate and lc_ctype: fr_FR.UTF_8the w10 lc_collate and lc_ctype: French_France.1252create table test (ble text, id serial primary key);insert into test(ble) values(' ');insert into test(ble) values('Marc');insert into test(ble) values(' Marc');insert into test(ble) values('marc');insert into test(ble) values(' marc');insert into test(ble) values('bobo');insert into test(ble) values(' bobo'):insert into test(ble) values('élise');differences include a french é character, and some white spaces at the beginning.then select * from test order by ble;centos result:ble | id
-------+----
| 3
bobo | 2
bobo | 1
élise | 6
marc | 5
marc | 4
Marc | 8
Marc | 7
(8 lignes)w10 result:ble | id
-------+----
| 3
bobo | 1
marc | 4
Marc | 7
élise | 8
bobo | 2
marc | 5
Marc | 6
(8 lignes)so, obviously, both lc_collate knows about the ébut obviously, too, they do behave differently on the impact of the beginning white space.I didn't see anything about this behaviour on the doc, unless the reference at the libc should be understood as please read and test libc doc on each platform.So my first question is: why ?My second question is: how to make the centos postgres behave like the w10 one ??ie. knowing about french characters AND taking beginning white spaces into account ?thanks,regards,