Greetings, * Bruce Momjian (bruce@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 06:08:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 09:31:15PM +0000, tom.beacon wrote: > > >> What is the best contact with whom to discuss possible violations of the pgsql > > >> license? > > > > > Uh, good question, and I could not find the answer easily. I would > > > report it to the owners of the Postgres trademark: > > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/trademarks/ > > > board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > A point worth making here is that the Postgres *license* is so lax > > that it's basically impossible to violate, unless maybe by redistributing > > the code sans COPYRIGHT file. And even if somebody were doing that, > > I doubt how much we'd care. > > I have received private reports of our COPYRIGHT not being properly > included in distributions so I am sensitive to those possible > violations, and I assume the trademark holders would deal with those as > well. One of the downsides of attributing the copyrights to an organization which doesn't exist (PGDG) is that, I would think anyway, it'd make it rather hard to actually enforce anything regarding copyright.. I'm not a lawyer though. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
