Search Postgresql Archives

Re: questions about wraparound

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2021-04-03 at 15:22 +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> why having a TransactionId that is 32 bits
> in depth while it is exposed (thru txid_current()) as a 64 bits value?
> I mean, having 64 bits would reduce the need for anti-wrap arpund
> vacuum. I suspect the usage of 32 bits is both for compatibility and
> tuple header size, but I'm just guessing.

Because there are two of these transaction IDs stored on each tuple
(xmin and xmax) to determine its visibility.  The overhead of 8 bytes
per tuples for visibility is already pretty high.

Another downside is that changing this would prevent the use of
pg_upgrade for upgrading, as the on-disk format changes.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux