Re: Is replacing transactions with CTE a good idea?

[Ron <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx>]

    On 4/1/21 10:04 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:

On 4/1/21 8:58 AM, Brian Dunavant wrote:

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 10:49 AM Glen Huang <heyhgl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If I decide to replace all my transaction code with CTE, will I shoot myself in the foot down the road?

I do this all the time and makes code way cleaner.   It's very straightforward with inserts queries.  When you deal with updates/deletes, things can be trickier.  I usually leave these in a transaction if there is any concern.

They can also be hard for future programmers that may not understand SQL.  Make sure you comment your queries for maintainability long term.  

I have yet to regret replacing a transaction with a CTE over the past decade.  YMMV

 

This must assume auto-commit mode where every single statement is "committed"?

    That's the only way to explain an otherwise very puzzling question. 
    OP must not do lots of DML in each transaction.

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.