Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Another thought: if it's not a sharing violation, I wonder if we > should consider dumping more raw Windows error information in the > messages we log, because, if I recall correctly, we're converting many > Windows error codes into few Unix-style error numbers and thereby > throwing away valuable clues. It makes it a bit more confusing when > trying to ask a Windows expert what might be happening. Yeah, I've wondered for some time if the apparent EACCES code is actually being mapped from something other than ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION in (some of?) these reports. The hard part is to hold onto the Windows error code alongside errno without massively invasive changes. regards, tom lane
