On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:37:51PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I guess you could make the case that the CCI call should be in the > callers where we actually loop (SetDefaultACLsInSchemas, > RemoveRoleFromObjectACL), but it's hard to get excited about the added > clutter. Yeah, that matches my thoughts. And I did not see any harm in putting the CCI in SetDefaultACL() even for the case of pg_default_acl with DROP OWNED BY. So applied and backpatched. Thanks, Alvaro and Andrus. -- Michael
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
