Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Strange (and good) side effect of partitioning ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I wrote:
> There's no specific mechanism in Postgres that would cause "X between 20
> and 10" to be reduced to constant-false

Wait, I take that back.  There is a mechanism that can conclude that
"X >= 20" and "X <= 10" are contradictory, but it's not applied by
default.  Observe:

regression=# set constraint_exclusion = default;
SET
regression=# explain select * from tenk1 where unique1 between 20 and 10;
                                 QUERY PLAN                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1  (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
   Index Cond: ((unique1 >= 20) AND (unique1 <= 10))
(2 rows)

regression=# set constraint_exclusion = on;     
SET
regression=# explain select * from tenk1 where unique1 between 20 and 10;
                QUERY PLAN                
------------------------------------------
 Result  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
   One-Time Filter: false
(2 rows)

The default value of constraint_exclusion is "partition", which means
(you guessed it) that it's applied only to potential partitioning
constraints.  This is a heuristic based on the typical payoff of
excluding whole partitions versus skipping an empty index scan.
But if you have a workload where it's really worth spending
planner cycles looking for self-contradictory queries, you can
turn it on.

			regards, tom lane





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux