Search Postgresql Archives
Re: Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append
From
: Michael Lewis <mlewis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:05:33 -0700
Cc
: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
d56c6b20ac6e9d7a69f0d695400bd229c203576c.camel@cybertec.at
>
References
: <
d56c6b20ac6e9d7a69f0d695400bd229c203576c.camel@cybertec.at
>
What have you tried? Changing the relevant cost parameters I assume? Nothing else going on that may be taking up those workers, right?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-query.html#GUC-PARALLEL-SETUP-COST
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
References
:
Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append
From:
Laurenz Albe
Prev by Date:
Re: postgres_fdw insert extremely slow
Next by Date:
limit of data type character varying
Previous by thread:
Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append
Next by thread:
Re: Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Postgresql Jobs]
[Postgresql Admin]
[Postgresql Performance]
[Linux Clusters]
[PHP Home]
[PHP on Windows]
[Kernel Newbies]
[PHP Classes]
[PHP Books]
[PHP Databases]
[Postgresql & PHP]
[Yosemite]
