Re: conflict with recovery when delay is gone

[Radoslav Nedyalkov <rnedyalkov@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:48 AM Mohamed Wael Khobalatte <mkhobalatte@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 2:46 PM Radoslav Nedyalkov <rnedyalkov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 8:13 PM Radoslav Nedyalkov <rnedyalkov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 7:37 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 15:24 +0200, Radoslav Nedyalkov wrote:
> On a very busy master-standby setup which runs typical olap processing -
> long living , massive writes statements,  we're getting on the standby:
>
>  ERROR:  canceling statement due to conflict with recovery
>  FATAL:  terminating connection due to conflict with recovery
>
> The weird thing is that cancellations happen usually after standby has experienced
> some huge delay(2h), still not at the allowed maximum(3h). Even recently run statements
> got cancelled when the delay is already at zero.
>
> Sometimes the situation got relaxed after an hour or so.
> Restarting the server instantly helps.
>
> It is pg11.8, centos7, hugepages, shared_buffers 196G from 748G.
>
> What phenomenon could we be facing?

Hard to say.  Perhaps an unusual kind of replication conflict?

What is in "pg_stat_database_conflicts" on the standby server?

db01=# select * from pg_stat_database_conflicts;

 datid |  datname  | confl_tablespace | confl_lock | confl_snapshot | confl_bufferpin | confl_deadlock
-------+-----------+------------------+------------+----------------+-----------------+----------------
 13877 | template0 |                0 |          0 |              0 |               0 |              0
 16400 | template1 |                0 |          0 |              0 |               0 |              0
 16402 | postgres  |                0 |          0 |              0 |               0 |              0
 16401 | db01      |                0 |          0 |             51 |               0 |              0
(4 rows)

On a freshly restarted standby we've just got similar behaviour after a 2 hours delay and a slow catch-up.

confl_snapshots is 51 and we have exactly the same number cancelled statements.

No luck so far. Searching for the explanation i found we fail into the unexplained case when

snapshot conflicts happen even hot_standby_feedback is on.

Thanks,

Rado

 

Perhaps you have a value set for old_snapshot_threshold? If not, do the walreceiver connections drop out?

 

old_snapshot_threshold is -1 on both master and replica.

walreceiver does not drop.