On 11/13/20 11:30 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:20 PM Kevin Brannen <KBrannen@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:KBrannen@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Go to the string funcs/ops page in v13, and try to quickly find the
ones that return an "int" (because your goal is to find the position
of something in a string so you know the return value will have to
be an "int").
That is not something I considered...I figured people would look for a
name that seems to reflect "position" or "in_string". I've never felt
the need to search based upon return type.
Which is an indication that for changes of this scope it would be
prudent to create a mock up and have end users see and comment on before
rolling them out.
Designing pages to the smallest media just frustrates those users on
larger media (cue the many examples on the web where the left/right
margins are so wide half of your screen is wasted instead of letting
the text flow and resize).]
It is just as bad it is so wide that one has to move their head instead
of just moving their eyes. If anything our tables could probably be
improved by enforcing a maximum width to the content area.
David J.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
