On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:53:44PM +0300, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In many cases concurrency is not a problem and in fact SQLite may > handle concurrent requests faster than Postgres. Since SQLite is > server-less and access overhead is near to zero (compared to Postgres) > each writer does its work quickly and no lock lasts for more than a > few dozen milliseconds. > On the other hand, Postgres is better in cases of really high concurrency. Presumably, this is no longer a problem, but many years ago (between 14 and 10 years ago) I was using sqlite for a low traffic website (probably no more than 40 users at a time), and the database became corrupted so often that I had had to automate rebuilding it from the latest backup and my own sql logs. I was very silly. Switching to postgres was the real solution. cheers, raf
