On Fri, October 2, 2020 21:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Fri, October 2, 2020 18:46, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The two likely possibilities are that Idempiere isn't connecting to the
>>> same database as you are doing manually, or that it is using a search_path
>>> setting that doesn't include the "public" schema.
>>> I think you could also get this if the "public" schema is not readable
>>> by Idempiere's userid, but that doesn't seem terribly likely.
>
>> idempiere=# \dn
>> List of schemas
>> Name | Owner
>> -----------+-----------
>> adempiere | adempiere
>> public | postgres
>
> Uh ... that rules out exactly none of those three possibilities.
> "\dn" says what schemas exist, but it tells you nothing about
> either search_path or privileges.
>
> You could try "select current_schemas(true)" to narrow things
> down a little bit, as that would show the active search path
> in your session.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Sorry about that. Still finding my way. Anyway, I believe that I may have
found the problem. When I created the test database I was following the
software installation guide. The user the guide refers to is 'adempiere' and
not 'idempiere_dbadmin'. At some point I came at the task from a different pov
and created another user to be the database owner. Cannot say why but it is
evident that is what I did.
I will resolve the conflict either by granting 'idempiere_dbadmin' the
necessary privileges or by changing the connection to use the 'adempiere' user
instead.
Thanks for the pointers.
Regards,
P.S. If it turns out to be something else then I will return with more details.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
