On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:28 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
This is called MVCC, which applies to a session as a whole. The point
here is that even if your application knows that only tableA is used
by a given transaction, Postgres cannot know that, as it could be
possible that data from tableB is needed in this same transaction, so
old versions of the rows from tableB matching with the snapshot hold
by this long-running transaction still have to be around.
Yes, I thought so. I just hoped there may be a workaround decoupling the tables.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Michael Holzman
Michael Holzman
