Thorsten Schöning schrieb am 31.08.2020 um 12:37: > So for what query size or number of IDs to compare in IN would you > consider a different approach at all? In my experience "hundreds" of IDs tend to be quite slow if used with an IN clause. Rewriting the IN to a JOIN against a VALUES clause is very often faster: So instead of: select * from t where id in (1,2,3, .... ,500); using this: select * from t join ( values (1),(2),(3),...(500) ) as x(id) on x.id = t.id produces more often than not a more efficient execution plan (assuming no values are duplicated in the IN list) Obviously I don't know if such a re-write is even feasible though. Thomas