Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Advancing the archiver position safely

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christophe Pettus <xof@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I've encountered a rather unusual situation (PostgreSQL 9.6).  On a
> particular server, for reasons I've not fully diagnosed, the archiver
> thinks that the current WAL segment to be archived is
> 0000000200003B6800000062.  This is unfortunate, because the oldest WAL
> segment that actually exists on disk is 0000000200003F1100000004, so
> the archive script is failing repeatedly because of the missing
> segment.
>
> The system is not actually missing important (for recovery) WAL segments, at least:
>
> Latest checkpoint's REDO WAL file:    000000020000417600000029
>
> I'd like to "catch up" the archiver such that it is operating on files
> that actually exist; besides setting archive_command to '/bin/true'
> and letting it chew through the old ones, is there a way of safely
> advancing the position of the archiver?

Take a look at the contents of your pg_xlog/archive_status directory
where you will likely find a .ready file corresponding to the missing
segment and perhaps others.

Deleting the .ready file should allow the archiver to get past the
missing file.

Make certain you're *not* mucking with the WAL files themselves.

> --
> -- Christophe Pettus
>    xof@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>

-- 
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres.consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux