Search Postgresql Archives

Re: 12.3 replicas falling over during WAL redo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-Aug-03, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> >      lsn      | checksum | flags | lower | upper | special | pagesize |
> > version | prune_xid
> > --------------+----------+-------+-------+-------+---------+----------+---------+-----------
> >  A0A/99BA11F8 |     -215 |     0 |   180 |  7240 |    8176 |     8192
> > |       4 |         0
> > 
> > As I understand what we're looking at, this means the WAL stream was
> > assuming this page was last touched by A0A/AB2C43D0, but the page itself
> > thinks it was last touched by A0A/99BA11F8, which means at least one write
> > to the page is missing?
> 
> Yeah, that's exactly what we're seeing.  Somehow an older page version
> was resurrected.  Of course, this should never happen.

... although, the block should have been in shared buffers, and it is
there that the previous WAL record would have updated -- not necessarily
flushed to disk.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux