On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 08:53:45PM +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > I agree these are all technical issues, but nevertheless - "implementation > details", which DBAs don't care about. What's important from a DBA's > perspective is not whether WAL is cluster-wide or database-wide, but whether > it's possible to manage backups/PITR/restores of individual databases in a more > convenient matter, which other RDBMS-vendors seem to provide. > > I love PG, have been using it professionally since 6.5, and our company depends > on it, but there are things other RDBMS-vendors do better... The bigger issue is that while we _could_ do this, it would add more problems and complexity, and ultimately, I think would make the software less usable overall and would be a net-negative. We know of no way to do it without a ton of negatives. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
