Search Postgresql Archives

Re: template0 needing vacuum freeze?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:51 PM Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Do you have an idea why autovac was failing to clear the issue on that one
problem table, though?

Before I intervened, the maintenance_work_mem was only 16MB (they had encoded and carried over PG 8 defaults in the chef recipe). I bumped it to 512MB before kicking off my freezeThat's the big factor I can think of. This is a huge table obviously as well. By the time it caught my attention there were 850M dead tuples to be cleaned up. My VACUUM FREEZE has been running just just about 5 days and is probably half way done. We shouldn't be at risk of hitting wraparound though (only 52% there).

Don.

--
Don Seiler
www.seiler.us

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux