On 5/13/2020 9:28 PM, David G. Johnston
wrote:
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020, Michael Paquier <michael@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, May
13, 2020 at 02:12:45PM -0700, live-school support wrote:
> I didn't recal that it was not possible to create a hot
standby with a fresh
> new install and pg_dumpall :(.
>
> only pg_basebackup or an exact copy of the data folder can
do it right? is
> the reason technical or else?
When using physical replication, both the primary and standby
need to
have the same system ID, and both instances need to share the
same
architectures to work properly as data is physically replayed
from one
cluster to the other using WAL, which includes for example
copies of
on disk relation 8kB pages (ever heard of full_page_writes?).
This basically hits the nail on the head. My reading is that
the OP has two abstractly identical restored databases, one
created from a physical copy and the other from a logical copy.
The issue is why the original server cannot use the same
replication slot name to continue synchronizing with the
logically restored one but is able to continue with the
physically restored one. The above is why.
The OP asks whether the technical identifier error
encountered can be overcome. It cannot but even if it could the
attempt would still end up failed due to fundamental differences
in the physical data layouts between physical and logical
restoration. If the OP needs to rebuild a physical replication
hot standby database they must use a physical backup of the
original database as a starting point. To use a logically
restored database target would require logical replication.
David J.
Thanks Michael and David for your answers
I think David caught it, the question is Why, as long as we have an
exact copy of the master (from pg_dumpall) we cannot start a new
initdb hot standby with an already existing physical replication
slots without the master complain about this "identifier doesn't
match up"
knowing that everything seems to be synchronized?
Sorry Michael to not show you more logs, I made these tests weeks
ago and cannot restart them for now, too busy on other jobs.
David
|