Greetings, * Bruce Momjian (bruce@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:54:34AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * BGoebel (b.goebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > initdb --data-checksums "... help to detect corruption by the I/O system" > > > There is an (negligible?) impact on performance, ok. > > > > > > Is there another reason NOT to use this feature ? > > > > Not in my view. > > > > > Has anyone had good or bad experience with the use of --data-checksums? > > > > Have had good experience with it. We should really make it the default > > already. > > Yeah, but I think we wanted more ability to change an existing cluster > before doing that since it would affect pg_upgraded servers. There's definitely a lot of reasons to want to have the ability to change an existing cluster. Considering the complications around running pg_upgrade already, I don't really think that changing the default of initdb would be that big a hurdle for folks to deal with- they'd try the pg_upgrade, get a very quick error that the new cluster has checksums enabled and the old one didn't, and they'd re-initdb the new cluster and then re-run pg_upgrade to figure out what the next issue is.. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
