> On Mar 21, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 3/20/20 8:13 PM, pabloa98 wrote: >> Nothing I saw that said int could not become bigint. >> My bad. The code cannot be a bigint. Or it could be a bigint between 1 to 99999999 :) > > > Aah, that was the counter Peter was talking about. I missed that. > > As to below that is going to require more thought. > Still no word on the actual requirement. As someone who believes consecutive numbers on digital invoices is simply a mistaken interpretation of the paper based system, I suspect a similar error here. But again we haven’t really heard, far as I know. Something really fishy about 99999999. >
