Search Postgresql Archives

Re: unexpected chunk number 2 (expected 0) for toast value ... in pg_toast_18536

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/15/20 12:20 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 07:23:49PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

We then tried to DELETE the offending row

	delete from blobs.doc_obj where pk = 82224;

but that, again, shows the "unexpected chunk" problem.

According to

	http://www.databasesoup.com/2013/10/de-corrupting-toast-tables.html

an UPDATE of the row is recommended -- should that work
better than a DELETE ?

I can't find documentation pointing to a fundamental
implementation difference that suggests so.

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/storage-toast.html#STORAGE-TOAST-ONDISK

"During an UPDATE operation, values of unchanged fields are normally preserved as-is; so an UPDATE of a row with out-of-line values incurs no TOAST costs if none of the out-of-line values change."




Karsten
--
GPG  40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6  5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B




--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux