Search Postgresql Archives

RE: Replication: slave server has 3x size of production server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





De: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Enviado: sábado, 22 de fevereiro de 2020 18:12
Para: Edson Richter <edsonrichter@xxxxxxxxxxx>; pgsql-general <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Assunto: Re: Replication: slave server has 3x size of production server?
 
On 2/22/20 11:23 AM, Edson Richter wrote:
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     *De:* Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     *Enviado:* sábado, 22 de fevereiro de 2020 16:16
>     *Para:* Edson Richter <edsonrichter@xxxxxxxxxxx>; pgsql-general
>     <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     *Assunto:* Re: Replication: slave server has 3x size of production
>     server?
>     On 2/22/20 11:03 AM, Edson Richter wrote:
>     >     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>
>     >
>     >
>     > Streaming replication. Initiated via pg_basebackup.
>     >
>     > Settings on master server:
>     >
>     > # - Sending Server(s) -
>     > # Set these on the master and on any standby that will send replication
>     > data.
>     > max_wal_senders = 2             # max number of walsender processes
>     > (change requires restart)
>     > wal_keep_segments = 25          # in logfile segments, 16MB each; 0 disables
>     > #wal_sender_timeout = 60s       # in milliseconds; 0 disables
>     > max_replication_slots = 2       # max number of replication
>     > slots (change requires restart)
>     > #track_commit_timestamp = off   # collect timestamp of transaction
>     > commit (change requires restart)
>     > # - Master Server -
>     > # These settings are ignored on a standby server.
>     > #synchronous_standby_names = '' # standby servers that provide sync
>     > rep number of sync standbys and comma-separated list of
>     > application_name from standby(s); '*' = all
>     > #vacuum_defer_cleanup_age = 0   # number of xacts by which cleanup is
>     > delayed
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Settings on slave server:
>     >
>     > # - Standby Servers -
>     > # These settings are ignored on a master server.
>     > hot_standby = on                        # "on" allows queries during
>     > recovery (change requires restart)
>     > max_standby_archive_delay = -1          # max delay before canceling
>     > queries when reading WAL from archive; -1 allows indefinite delay
>     > max_standby_streaming_delay = -1        # max delay before canceling
>     > queries when reading streaming WAL; -1 allows indefinite delay
>     > wal_receiver_status_interval = 10s      # send replies at least this
>     > often 0 disables
>     > hot_standby_feedback = on               # send info from standby to
>     > prevent query conflicts
>     > wal_receiver_timeout = 0                # time that receiver waits for
>     > communication from master in milliseconds; 0 disables
>     > wal_retrieve_retry_interval = 5s        # time to wait before retrying
>     > to retrieve WAL after a failed attempt
>
>     What are the settings for:
>
>     archive_mode
>     archive_command
>
>     on the standby?
>
>     Are the files in pg_xlog on the standby mostly from well in the past?
>
>
> Actually, standby server is sending wals to a backup (barman) server:
>
> archive_mode = always           # enables archiving; off, on, or always
> (change requires restart)
> archive_command = 'rsync -e "ssh -2 -C -p 2022" -az %p
> barman@192.168.0.2:/dados/barman/dbcluster/incoming/%f'

And the above is working, the files are showing up on the barman server?

Yes, it is working. Last X'log file is present on all thee servers.
Also, comparting last transaction number on master and slave shows that all are in sync.
Last, but not least, select max(id) from a busy table shows same id (when queried almost simultaneously using a simple test routine).

>
>
> The files are about 7 months old.

Are there newer files that would indicate that the streaming is working?

Yes, streaming is working properly (as stated above).

Thanks,


Edson Richter


>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Edson
>
>     >
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     >
>     > Edson
>     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > Edson
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     Adrian Klaver
>     >     adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     >
>
>
>     --
>     Adrian Klaver
>     adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux