Search Postgresql Archives

Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:58:56 +0100
In-reply-to: <2ac63204-df5d-1d2a-d55e-a3ba9189e0a7@codata.eu>
References: <2ac63204-df5d-1d2a-d55e-a3ba9189e0a7@codata.eu>
User-agent: Evolution 3.32.5 (3.32.5-1.fc30)

On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 12:09 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote:
> is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the 
> logical replication ?

Yes, if you don't want physical backups.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
  - From: Arnaud L.

References:
- minimal wal_level on subscriber
  - From: Arnaud L.

Prev by Date: Re: Inexplicable duplicate rows with unique constraint
Next by Date: Re: pg_stat_statements extension
Previous by thread: minimal wal_level on subscriber
Next by thread: Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux