On 12/5/19 7:40 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 07:12:22PM -0600, Ron wrote:
On 12/5/19 1:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
It's been considered, and rejected, many times. Aside from the overhead
involved, there are too many different ideas of what such dates ought to
mean (e.g., what should happen during dump/restore? does a failed
transaction update last-modified? etc etc). You can search the
project's mailing list archives if you want to read the prior discussions.
All the other RDBMSs seem to have figured it out.
It does not necessarily mean that Postgres has to do it.
That's not what I wrote.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
