Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PG11 Parallel Thanks!!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason Ralph <jralph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I wanted to drop a quick note thanking the developers who have
> contributed to Postgres.  I have recently upgraded our production PG
> instances from pg9.3 to pg11.

>
> We do a lot of table syncs, and we have one process at the end of the
> month that syncs 3 very large tables (400GB).  This sync happens from
> a shell script using pg_dump and pg_restore, we have it set to use -j3
> but it's called sequentially so it never really takes advantage of
> parallel.
>
> Since pg11 on both the target and source, the run time has decreased a
> lot, I chalk it up to the parallel index creations in pg11 which was a
> very time consuming process on pg9.3.
> The process has finished almost 10 hours earlier than pg93.  So thank
> you for your hard work and dedication to this awesome piece of
> software.

This is a great user story. Thanks for sharing your experience, Jason.

-- 
Pankaj Jangid





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux