Search Postgresql Archives

Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Can anybody shed som light 
> on when negative-prefix is supposed to be respected by PG's 
> formatting-functions? In lc_numeric='nb_NO.UTF-8' negative-prefix is '−'(8722), 
> not '-'(45), at least in the JAVA-world, but it seems the JDBC-driver must use 
> lc_numeric='C' when parsing server output. -- Andreas Joseph Krogh CTO / Partner

PG does not consider LC_NUMERIC at all when producing output from
the standard numeric data types (and we aren't going to start).
AFAIR the only functions that do pay attention to LC_NUMERIC are
to_char() and friends.

			regards, tom lane






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux