Hi KarlI did not double check with the doc whether the SQL you posted is valid (I guess it could by applying the defaults) however I do not see how sequences would govern the sending of data to users.
Kind regards Thiemo Quoting Karl Martin Skoldebrand <KS0C77263@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi,I'm trying to troubleshoot a case where users are getting data from a database, despite they having said they are not interested. There is a number of sequences in the database in question, but to me they look "empty", like stubs.create sequence db_table_seq; alter sequence db_table_seq owner to dbnameuser; (all names obfuscated)To me it look like the only thing going is changing the ownership of the sequence. For unknown reasons.What is your impression the intention is with this? //Martin S ============================================================================================================================Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html <http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html> externally http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html <http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html> internally within TechMahindra.============================================================================================================================
-- S/MIME Public Key: https://oc.gelassene-pferde.biz/index.php/s/eJuAUFONag6ofnH Signal (Safer than WhatsApp): +49 1578 7723737 Handys: +41 78 947 36 21 | +49 1578 772 37 37Tox-Id: B7282A9E31D944DDAD1ECC5B33C36AAE80B32D119AB7391D602C937A65E8CA0625C495C5322B
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>