|
On 10/6/19 9:52 π.μ., Pawan Sharma
wrote:
Thanks all,
Is pg_upgrade is the best method if I am doing
upgrade on same server or different server.
Same server means: source and Target on same
server
Different: source and Target are different
server.
A traditional upgrade by definition is on the same server, (if we
are not talking about logical replication or any other equivalent
technology).
So yes pg_upgrade is what would be best, along with -k (--link) for
maximum speed.
On Mon, Jun
10, 2019 at 09:00:38AM +0300, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> On 10/6/19 7:36 π.μ., Pawan Sharma wrote:
>> What is the best way to upgrade from PostgreSQL 9.6
to PostgreSQL
>> 11 instead of pg_upgrade.
>
> why not pg_upgrade ? If the size is near the 3TB mark as
you say,
> pg_upgrade is the fastest IMHO.
When it comes to upgrades, you could also look at logical
replication. Unfortunately your origin version cannot do
that. Have
you looked at things like BDR or Slony? They are
logical-based,
meaning a lower downtime than pg_upgrade, but they take
longer.
For 3TB pg_upgrade can also be very fast if you use --link.
Be wary
of having backups though, all the time.
--
Michael
--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
|
