Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Recommendation to run vacuum FULL in parallel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



And future updates can reuse it, too (an update is very similar to an
insert+delete).


Hm, then it's strange our DB takes 6 times as much space compared to freshly restored one (only public schema is considered).

Not if autovacuum has a chance to run between updates.

Ours is run regularly, although we had to tweak it down not to interfere with normal database activity, so it takes several hours each run on the table. We did that by setting autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.05 from default 0.2.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux