Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Key encryption and relational integrity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Key encryption and relational integrity
From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:50:57 +0100
Di_x_sposition-notification-to: Karsten.Hilbert@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190328225050.3jtlhwke77uaiabu@hjp.at>
Ma_x_il-followup-to: d
Re_x_turn-receipt-to: Karsten.Hilbert@xxxxxxx
References: <094bf875-5b49-8d3c-1fa3-97c07246b890@evolu-s.it> <CAG0dhZCLGR2YB1TckUFaP5OHwDr6UdmBc7j=g0kK6jZz-2sB8Q@mail.gmail.com> <b751ba08-2ca8-353b-e09f-50a7c930747f@evolu-s.it> <20190328225050.3jtlhwke77uaiabu@hjp.at>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

What Andrea Moreno's client seems to think is required by
GDPR is clearly bogus -- it would render illegal any and all
DICOM images existing today, because they contain
programmatically easily processable personally identifying
data right inside the clinical data.

Karsten Hilbert
--
GPG  40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6  5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Key encryption and relational integrity
  - From: Moreno Andreo
- Re: Key encryption and relational integrity
  - From: Tony Shelver
- Re: Key encryption and relational integrity
  - From: Moreno Andreo
- Re: Key encryption and relational integrity
  - From: Peter J. Holzer

Prev by Date: PostgreSQL equivalent of Oracle "member of"
Next by Date: Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of Oracle "member of"
Previous by thread: Re: Key encryption and relational integrity
Next by thread: Re: Key encryption and relational integrity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux