> On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Christian Henz <c.henz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I know I'm late to the party, but we're only now migrating from > Postgres 9.x, realizing that pgadmin3 does not support Postgres 11. > > I have checked out pgadmin4, but I don't like it at all. My colleagues > feel the same way, and some web searching suggests that we are not > alone. > > So I wonder if there are any active forks of pgadmin3? There's the BigSQL fork, which had at least some minimal support for 10. I've no idea whether it's had / needs anything for 11. > > I found some on Github with some significant changes that I assume > were done by people working for VK, the Russian social network. These > appear to be personal hacks though (monosyllabic commit messages, build > scripts added with hard coded local paths etc.). > > There are also the Debian packages that have patches adding Postgres > 10 support among other things. Not sure if there would be interest > there in continuing to support newer Postgres versions. > > Are there other, more organized efforts to continue pgadmin3? > > Are there technical reasons why such a continuation would not make > sense? > It's significant work, and it'd be expended maintaining a fairly mediocre GUI client. You might see if you like OmniDB, or one of the other GUI clients, perhaps? https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Clients Cheers, Steve > Cheers, > Christian > > -- > Christian Henz > Software Developer, software & vision Sarrazin GmbH & Co. KG > >
