Thank you for asking several times for a benchmark. I wrote it now and it is visible: inserting random bytes into bytea is much slower, if you use the psycopg2 defaults. Here is the chart: https://github.com/guettli/misc/blob/master/bench-bytea-inserts-postrgres.png And here is the script which creates the chart: https://github.com/guettli/misc/blob/master/bench-bytea-inserts-postrgres.py Please let me know if there is something wrong or could get improved. Regards, Thomas Güttler Am 18.03.19 um 15:33 schrieb Thomas Güttler:
I did some benchmarking and in my setup there was major performance difference. I tested a ByteA column. If I used ascii data the tests took 52 seconds. If I used random binary data the test took 250 seconds. binary data is (roughly) five times slower than ascii data? Is this a know fact, or is there something wrong with my benchmark? I used Python and psycopg2. Regards, Thomas Güttler
-- Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/ I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines
