Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Performance of ByteA: ascii vs binary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 19.03.19 um 20:37 schrieb Peter J. Holzer:
On 2019-03-18 15:33:17 +0100, Thomas Güttler wrote:
I did some benchmarking and in my setup there was major
performance difference.

I tested a ByteA column.

If I used ascii data the tests took 52 seconds.
If I used random binary data the test took 250 seconds.

binary data is (roughly) five times slower than ascii data?

Is this a know fact, or is there something wrong with my benchmark?

I used Python and psycopg2.

I don't see this here (Debian 9, Python 3,5, psycopg2 2.7.6, PostgreSQL
9.5).

I modified my bench-bytea script (https://github.com/hjp/blob-bench) to
restrict the byte values to printable ASCII (32 .. 126). There was
absolutely no difference, as the attached graph shows.

Strange. I saw a big difference.
What did you test?
I tested inserts.

Regards,
  Thomas Güttler



--
Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux