Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Do all superuser processes count toward superuser_reserved_connections?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 9:48 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/14/19 8:23 AM, Jeremy Finzel wrote:
> I don't find a clear mention in the docs of superuser processes that are
> exempt from counting toward superuser_reserved_connections.  So I would
> think that it's possible that postgres autovac workers ought to count
> toward that.  Am I wrong about that?  I actually have the same question

AFAICK autovacuum workers do not use the connections referred to above.
The details can be found here:

https://doxygen.postgresql.org/autovacuum_8c.html

Not sure I can really grok that and how it answers the question.  Are you saying if you have max_connections set to 10, you could theoretically have 20 autovac processes still?
 
> about pglogical replication background workers and manager, which also
> run as postgres.

But the actual connection can be by a different user:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/logical-replication-security.html


But I am speaking of pglogical, which does require superuser, last I checked :).

It does use replication slots, but there are processes corresponding to each subscription.  I have some databases with dozens of them.

Thanks,
Jeremy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux