Search Postgresql Archives

Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:33:02 +0100
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAKoxK+6H40imynM5P31bf0DnpN-5f5zeROjcaj6BKVAjxdEA9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKoxK+6H40imynM5P31bf0DnpN-5f5zeROjcaj6BKVAjxdEA9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:22 PM Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> What's wrong with using a mountpoint?

You can see most obvious reasons at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247477

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
  - From: Peter J. Holzer
- Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
  - From: Luca Ferrari

References:
- why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
  - From: Luca Ferrari

Prev by Date: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
Next by Date: Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
Previous by thread: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
Next by thread: Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux