Am 29.01.2019 um 17:39 schrieb Tom Lane: > "Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth" <gunnar.bluth@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Tried >> SELECT 0x5e73266725; [...] > SELECT 0 AS x5e73266725; > > and that's the result you got. Well, yeah, _that_ was pretty obvious. I just didn't expect ot to happen... > I think that the SQL standard considers adjacent tokens to be invalid > unless one of them is punctuation (e.g. 1+2), but our lexer is a bit > less rigid about that. it kind of comforts me that it's at least not defined like that in the standard ;-) Cheers anyway! -- Gunnar "Nick" Bluth RHCE/SCLA Mobil +49 172 8853339 Email: gunnar.bluth@xxxxxxxxxxx __________________________________________________________________________ In 1984 mainstream users were choosing VMS over UNIX. Ten years later they are choosing Windows over UNIX. What part of that message aren't you getting? - Tom Payne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
