Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Change from 9.6 to 11?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:12 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/20/18 5:51 PM, Chuck Martin wrote:

Please reply to list also.
Ccing list.

>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 7:56 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     On 12/20/18 12:35 PM, Chuck Martin wrote:
>      > I hope someone here can see something that eludes me. I've recently
>      > moved a database from PostgreSQL 9.6 to 11, and there are a few
>      > oddities. The following select statement returns zero rows when it
>      > should return one. This is one of a small number of records that
>     exist,
>      > but are not returned by the query. When I include the main table,
>     event,
>      > and any one of the associated tables, the record is returned, but no
>      > record is returned with the entire statement. All the primary keys
>      > (_pkey) and foreign keys (_fkey) are integers. The field I
>     suspect as
>      > the possible culprit, event.InsBy, is a character column I'm
>     converting
>      > to do a lookup on a primary key (integer): event.InsBy::int =
>      > usr.Usr_pkey. Maybe PG 11 doesn't recognize the same syntax for
>     cast as
>      > PG 9.6? Or maybe I'm overlooking something else basic. Thanks for
>     reading!
>
>     So if in the WHERE you leave out the:
>
>     AND event.InsBy::int = usr.Usr_pkey
>
>     and in the SELECT you add:
>
>     event.InsBy, event.InsBy::int AS InsByInt
>
>     what do you see?
>
>
> I get 91 copies of the record. One for each record in the usr table.

But do the event.InsBy, event.InsBy::int AS InsByInt values match each
other?

Just had a thought, what if you join just the event and usr tables on:

event.InsBy::int = usr.Usr_pkey

Trying to determine whether your suspected culprit really is the culprit.

Thanks, Adrian. This led me to the problem. The data in InsBy was invalid. That is to say, a join wasn’t possible because no record exists with that primary key. Not sure how that occurred, but now I know why. Had I anticipated this might happen, I would have used an outer join. 

I appreciate your help solving this minor, but annoying, issue.



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx

--
Chuck Martin
Avondale Software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux