Search Postgresql Archives
Re: shared_buffers on Big RAM systems
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: shared_buffers on Big RAM systems
From
: Rene Romero Benavides <rene.romero.b@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:25:28 -0600
Cc
: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
b28c6930-5800-c821-95ee-0a065e6ff18e@gmail.com
>
References
: <
b28c6930-5800-c821-95ee-0a065e6ff18e@gmail.com
>
This topic seems to be always open to discussion. In my opinion, it depends on how big your work dataset is, there's no use in sizing shared_buffers beyond that size. I think, the most reasonable thing is analyzing each case as proposed here:
https://www.keithf4.com/a-large-database-does-not-mean-large-shared_buffers/
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Follow-Ups
:
Installing pg_buffercache (was Re: shared_buffers on Big RAM systems)
From:
Ron
References
:
shared_buffers on Big RAM systems
From:
Ron
Prev by Date:
why use phpPgAdmin (was: RE: Importing tab delimited text file using phpPgAdmin 5.1 GUI)
Next by Date:
Re: shared_buffers on Big RAM systems
Previous by thread:
shared_buffers on Big RAM systems
Next by thread:
Installing pg_buffercache (was Re: shared_buffers on Big RAM systems)
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Postgresql Jobs]
[Postgresql Admin]
[Postgresql Performance]
[Linux Clusters]
[PHP Home]
[PHP on Windows]
[Kernel Newbies]
[PHP Classes]
[PHP Books]
[PHP Databases]
[Postgresql & PHP]
[Yosemite]