Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Idle query that's not "<IDLE>"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Idle query that's not "<IDLE>"?
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 13:53:37 -0700
Cc: "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <579485f2-10a5-50bc-ef15-f731e756e970@gmail.com>
References: <579485f2-10a5-50bc-ef15-f731e756e970@gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why do these idle queries (pids 8357, 11260 and 11355) "remember" the queries they ran instead of having the text "<IDLE>"?

Because having the text "<IDLE>" is redundant with the field status=idle

David J.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Idle query that's not "<IDLE>"?
  - From: Ron

Prev by Date: Re: Idle query that's not "<IDLE>"?
Next by Date: Re: Idle query that's not "<IDLE>"?
Previous by thread: Re: Idle query that's not "<IDLE>"?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux