Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:16:09 +0100,
 Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> writes:
I have something that seems to produce it on rhel7. Fedora isn't working
well either, but the difference may be due to postgresql.conf being
different or some difference in the Fedora build.

Hmm, in my hands this produces the same size leak (~28GB) in either v10
or v11.  In HEAD, somebody's made it even worse (~43GB).  So this is
certainly pretty broken, but I'm not sure why it seems worse to you in
v11 than before.

As a short term work around, could I create the index first and use insert statements, each in their own transaction, to get the table loaded with the index?

Is the issue on Fedora taking very long to build a normal spgist index for network addresses worth pursuing separately, or is it likely to be the same underlying cause? I don't really need to get this working there, as that was just to help with testing.

I could also try adjusting memory limits temporarily. If the leak is 28GB on a 32GB system I might be able to get the index built if less memory is tied up in other things. My workstation also has 32GB and the exclude index did build there with the postgresql.conf having lower memory limits.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux