Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Sv: Re: Oracle vs PG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/23/18 2:34 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
På tirsdag 23. oktober 2018 kl. 22:45:36, skrev Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>>:

    On 10/23/18 12:58 PM, Ravi Krishna wrote:
     > Well it is Aurora.
     >
     >
    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/23/amazon-move-off-oracle-caused-prime-day-outage-in-warehouse.html
     >

    Since the article was almost content-free I not would use it on either
    side of the argument. The only thing I pulled from it was Amazon changed
    databases and hit the learning curve. That will happen in either
    direction.

Is it so hard to accept commercial databases have advantages?

That is entirely possible. My point is that the article does not contain enough information to make that determination. As with many media articles it was written to support the headline, not to actually shed light on the issue.


I find that not one bit surprising.
I've used PG since 90's and it's no secret the "big guys" beat PG on certain workloads.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
​


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux