On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 9:07 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 8:24 AM Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:So i need unlimited length data type for required column of the table for storing the large valuesis there any issue to use unlimited length datatype text for the required column of the table instead of using varchar ?Between the two you should use the "text" data type for those columns. You will need to describe your use case in more detail if you want input as to whether you need to use the large object API instead.The database cannot store an unlimited amount of data in a single row+column (cell) - you will still encounter a physical limit to the number of bytes able to be stored in a single cell when using text.David J.
Hi sir
i need to store more values on required column of the table by using text than varchar
you said that physical limit needs to be stored values in column of the table
text | variable unlimited length |
Thank you for this valuable information
PostgreSQL is always no 1 world s leading open source RDBMS
I request you all community members to provide built in bdr v3 version replication for public as multimaster replication is on high priority against other dbms
