Greetings, * Chris Travers (chris.travers@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > I said I would stand aside my objections after the last point I mentioned > them but I did not feel that my particular objection and concern with > regard to one specific sentence added got much of a hearing. This being > said, it is genuinely hard to sort through the noise and try to reach the > signal. I think the resurgence of the debate about whether we need a code > of conduct made it very difficult to discuss specific objections to > specific wording. So to be honest the breakdown was mutual. I would ask that you, and anyone else who has a suggestion for how to improve or revise the CoC, submit your ideas to the committee by email'ing coc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx. As was discussed previously, the current CoC isn't written in stone and it will be changed and amended as needed. Thanks! Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
