On 08/28/2018 10:40 PM, ss wrote:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test(year VARCHAR)
RETURNS TABLE (agencycode INT, bureaucode INT, acctname VARCHAR, beacat
VARCHAR, onoffbudget VARCHAR, val INT)
AS $$
BEGIN
RETURN QUERY SELECT t1.agencycode, t1.bureaucode, t1.acctcode,
t2.beacat, t2.onoffbudget, t2.XXXXXX FROM allnames AS t1
JOIN total AS t2 on t1.agencycode = t2.agencycode and t1.bureaucode =
t2.bureaucode and t1.acctcode = t2.acctcode
WHERE t2.XXXXXXX != 0 ORDER BY t1.agencycode, t1.bureaucode, t1.acctcode;
END; $$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
I want to replace XXXXXXX with the argument year.
I hard coded the XXXXXX with 'y2016' and I get back a table
So something along lines of:
DO $$
DECLARE
col_name varchar;
out_str varchar;
BEGIN
col_name = 'y'||'2018';
out_str = format('SELECT %I FROM some_table where %I = 0',
col_name, col_name );
RAISE NOTICE '%', out_str;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
NOTICE: SELECT y2018 FROM some_table where y2018 = 0
Would something like 't2.'||(year)|| work?
On 08/28/2018 10:37 PM, Tim Cross wrote:
Off the top of my head, I think you could do this using dynamic
(execute) SQL in a function. However, it is going to be messy,
possibly slow and likely fragile. You would need to query the
catalogue to get the column names in the table and then build the SQL
dynamically 'on the fly'.
Without having more detail, my spider sense tells me you have the
wrong table/relationship design. While you may be able to get it to
work, it is likely you will run into constant problems and additional
complexity that could be avoided with a different design. You really
want a design where your queries are driven by the data in your tables
and not by the names of columns. I would seriously consider
re-examining your schema design, look at how your design fits in with
the normal forms and adapt as necessary.
Tim
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 15:10, ss <ss@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:ss@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I have a table with many years as columns. y1976, y2077, .. ,
y2019,y2020 I want to dynamically return a column from a function.
select * from FUNCTION('y2016') .....
select t1.cola t1.colb, t1.colc, t2.y2016 from ..... Where
t2.y2016 != 0;
or if I select year y2012 I want FUNCTION('y2012')
select t1.cola t1.colb, t1.colc, t2.y2012 from ..... Where
t2.y2012 != 0;
to generalize
select * from FUNCTION( year_column )
select t1.cola t1.colb, t1.colc, t2.year_column from ..... Where
t2.year_column != 0;
is it possible? if so how?
--
regards,
Tim
--
Tim Cross
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
