On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 12:40:16PM +0200, Andreas Kretschmer wrote: > On 3 August 2018 12:33:26 CEST, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>Hm, a co-worker noticed that we have max_wal_size = 16GB, that might be >>the >>reason:-) > > Yes ;-) Worth mentioning that this is a soft size, and not a hard size, hence depending on your worload you may see more WAL segments than what is set in 16GB. The docs mention that, so no need to be surprised. -- Michael
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
