Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Template0 datfrozenxid age is 160million and progressing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-08-01 12:07:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On 2018-08-01 10:24:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> IMO, the action you need to take is enabling autovacuum.  We've
> >> seen many many people go down the path you are taking, and it's
> >> generally led to no good in the end.  Manual vacuuming tends
> >> to miss stuff, and it cannot react adequately to activity spikes.
> 
> > But it shouldn't matter here, autovacuum will start regardless, no?
> 
> Sure, once it decides that emergency anti-wraparound vacuuming is
> necessary.  I really doubt the OP wants that to happen; it's the
> exact opposite of non-intrusive.

That's solely what would trigger it were autovacuum enabled, too? I've
complained about "emergency anti-wraparound" beeing anything but
emergency (they're largely unavoidable unless you manually script it),
but they're what happen once autovacuum_freeze_max_age is reached, and
that's the only trigger for vacuuming old relations independent of other
activity?

Greetings,

Andres Freund




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux