Hi, On 2018-07-30 19:11:34 -0400, Melvin Davidson wrote: > *Of course. Would you be so kind as to point out where in the > information_schema it * > *indicates if a table has a primary key or not. Oh wait, now I > remember...no place.* As Adrian pointed out, that's wrong. It's in information_schema. You're pretty damn antagonistic while asking for things. > *>Keeping random atavistic things around, would slow us down, which will be > a>price everybody is paying. * > *Random atavistic things? I hardly think relhaspkey is random. It's been > there since version 7.2.* > *Exactly how does keeping it around slow you/us down?* Being old doesn't imply it's not superfluous and/or slows us down. There've been a number of discussions and bug reports about the inaccuracy - even though it's documented! - it in the last few years. That alone costs time. Additionally it's code we need to maintain. Greetings, Andres Freund
