There is only one set of logs since it's a hardware cluster. The two nodes share the underlying database storage. Not sure why, but when the log rolled over this morning, connections started getting logged. All is good now. Thanks for your help.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/23/2018 12:50 PM, Sandy Becker wrote:
Please reply to list also.
Ccing list.
Two servers set up in a hardware cluster for automatic failover. That's all I know about it.
Alright, so which server's logs are you looking at?
Long term it would be a good thing to know how the cluster/failover is setup, as that is something folks on this list are going to ask when attempting to answer a question. Just trying to get ahead of the inevitable:)
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com >> wrote:
On 07/23/2018 08:14 AM, Sandy Becker wrote:
I have postgresql 9.4 on a cluster, hardware based. I need to
be able to see which users are connecting to which database and
when to be in compliance with our security policies.
I have set the following in the postgresql.conf and did a pg_ctl
reload:
log_connections = on
log_line_prefix = '%t [%p]:[%u]:[%h]-[%d] [%1-1]'
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be logging the connections. This is what I have used on our non-clustered instances and it's
working as expected. Have I missed something relating to
logging on a cluster? The second node is strictly for
automatice failover, so nothing is actually running there at the
moment.
Can you define what you mean by a cluster?
Thank you in advance for any suggestions.
Sandy
-- Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com >
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
